Showing posts with label KUBICA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label KUBICA. Show all posts

Wednesday, 9 February 2011

Citroen says Raikkonen free to make F1 return

Kimi Raikkonen can pull out of the 2011 world rally championship to return to F1 if he wants to.
That is the claim of Citroen's rally chief Olivier Quesnel, amid reports the 2007 world champion is now contractually committed to rallying for this season.
The Finn and his management have not yet responded to multiple attempts by the Formula One media to confirm rumours that Raikkonen, 31, is a candidate to replace the injured Robert Kubica at Renault this year.
After making his full-time world rally debut with Citroen last year, the former McLaren and Ferrari driver has announced he will drive a Citroen DS3 under the Ice 1 entry in 2011.
"If he wants to leave, I couldn't say anything because he is a client," Quesnel told RMC Sport.
"He has rented a car from us and drives with his own sponsors," added the Citroen boss.
"I suppose there may be considerable pressure from Bernie Ecclestone, the FIA and the whole world of F1 who want to see him come back because he is still an emblematic driver for the sport."
However, Quesnel indicated that he doesn't think Raikkonen is too keen to go back to F1.
"If he is taking phone calls, they would have to be very convincing to get him back there," he said.

Heidfeld and Liuzzi in frame for Renault drive

With Robert Kubica almost certain to miss the majority of, if not all, of the 2011 season following his Italian rally accident on Sunday morning, a number of names are now being linked to the vacant Lotus Renault GP seat alongside Vitaly Petrov.

Although all thoughts continue to remain with the injured Pole, who requires at least another two operations following initial seven-hour surgery on Sunday, a selection of drivers are already being named as possible replacements – not least 2007 World Champion and current World Rally driver Kimi Räikkönen.



With Kubica out 
of action, the search is now on for a substitute
With Kubica out of action, the search is now on for a substitute
However, Team Principal Eric Boullier has now also mentioned former Sauber and Force India racers Nick Heidfeld and Vitantonio Liuzzi as candidates.

“We spent about a quarter of an hour with Robert (in hospital),” Boullier explained to IVG.it. “We joked and were in good spirits. Of course, he immediately wanted to know the team’s schedule for this season.

“We are searching for a Kubica replacement. The possible names are (reserve driver) Senna, Liuzzi and Heidfeld. The team is close to Robert, though, and we are waiting with open arms, hoping he can return by the end of the season.”

Monday, 7 February 2011

Why racers take risks and why we love them for it

‘Did you never think of stopping Robert (Kubica) from taking part in rallies?’ asked L’Equipe newspaper to Renault team boss Eric Boullier today.
“Not for one second,” replied Boullier, “He could just as easily have been knocked over by a bus. Robert is a racer, he loves cars and he lives for nothing but racing. Competing is his essence. At 14 he slept in a kart factory because he loved racing. From the outset it was agreed among us that Robert would do rallies as well as F1. It was vital for him. His strength comes from that passion. I never thought about the risk. Motor sport is dangerous, but he loves it.”
Photo: Darren Heath

I have found the reaction to Robert Kubica’s accident fascinating and enlightening. There is the team principal above, who understood him and attempts here to justify the decision to let him compete elsewhere, then the rival team bosses who are both appalled by the injury and surprised by Renault’s relaxed attitude to Kubica’s extra curricular activities. There are the fans and media, some of whom castigate him for taking unnecessary risks so close to the start of the season and others who simply feel terribly sorry for him and his plight.To recap, the latest bulletins from the doctors suggest a horrendous injury to his right arm which caused him to lose a lot of blood and despite some heroics by surgeons, the experts in the field to whom I’ve spoken suggest he may never regain fine motor function in that hand and if so his F1 career is unlikely to continue. Of course there are always miracle comebacks, but that is what will be required here for him to race an F1 car again. Renault disagree and say the doctors are exaggerating and that he will recover within a year.
Kubica was injured in a rally car, when a pole supporting an armco barrier, appears to have pierced the floor of the Skoda he was driving and caused the injury. A freak accident, like the one Frank Williams suffered on the road. A few years ago Kubica walked away from an accident in Montreal which was many times worse in terms of impact energy, but F1 cars are built much more strongly than rally cars.
So why did he do it? Why did he take the risk of losing everything just to satisfy some urge to drive fast? And will this put an end to drivers doing anything but the most safe hobbies in future?
I grew up with a father who was a racing driver. He raced for Team Lotus in the 1960s. If you’ve not lived with it, it’s hard to explain the ‘daredevil gene’ racers have, which forces them to race. It’s a restlessness, a need to challenge oneself. At the margin it’s almost a kind of rage.
I don’t have it, I recognised that early on, but throughout 22 years working in F1 I’ve seen it countless times in the eyes of the racers I’ve encountered. Why else did Valentino Rossi and Kimi Raikkonen do rallies while holding down major roles with leading teams? Why did Jim Clark or Stirling Moss drive every kind of car they could get their hands on?
Juan Manuel Fangio once said, “There are those who keep out of mischief, and there are the adventurers. We racing drivers are adventurers; the more difficult something is, the greater the attraction that comes from it.”
This is the best quote I’ve ever come across to explain why racers race and it also why we love them for it. Nowadays F1 cars are still challenging to drive on the limit, but they are so safe that drivers have become quite matter of fact about the risk in their job.
1970s F1 driver Patrick Depailler used to enjoy hang gliding in his spare time. He had a bad accident and was still recovering from it when he was killed in F1 testing in 1980. No-one would allow an F1 driver today to go hang gliding, but the question is, in this age of ultra professionalism, should drivers be forced to avoid all dangerous sports in their spare time? I think they might after this and a little bit more of that racer spirit will be lost.
This looked set to be a breakthrough year for Renault after two years of struggle. Team owner Gerard Lopez said last summer that he wanted to build the team around Kubica, so should Renault have stopped him taking part in the meaningless rally in Italy which has now put the team’s whole season in jeopardy? Who is going to score 150 plus points for them?
Other team principals I’ve spoken to today say that their drivers would not be able to take part in such activities. Insurance is a big factor. To insure an F1 driver for F1 driving is actually quite cheap now, because the cars are so safe. A team will typically insure a driver against being unavailable to them. So if a driver is unavailable, the insurance company will pay out for his replacement. They may also pay out for his salary.
The driver, on the other hand, will typically insure himself against injury and loss of earnings. The premiums rise significantly the more they take part in dangerous side sports like rallying. Kubica’s manager Daniel Morrelli is a very precise, careful individual and he will no doubt have taken care to ensure that his client was correctly insured.
Bruno Senna is reserve driver and if he has brought money to the team, as has been suggested, that may come with a clause which gives him the drive da facto. If not, Renault may look to someone like Nico Hulkenberg, who will have a clause in his Force India reserve driver contract releasing him if a race seat comes up elsewhere. That is standard. It may be Nick Heidfeld who gets yet another chance.
But one thing’s for sure, Renault will have to look to someone else to drive for them this year.

By James Allen

Raikkonen to replace injured Kubica?

Kimi Raikkonen is top of Lotus Renault's list to replace the injured Robert Kubica following his crash at a rally event on Sunday morning.


See large picture
Kimi Raikkonen relaxing before Rally Finland in 2010. Photo by Red Bull GmbH and GEPA pictures GmbH.

Despite original fears that the 26 year-old might loose his right hand following the accident in Italy, surgeons have confirmed that he is expected to make a recovery but that he is not likely to return until the end of the year. This has left Renault with few options open to it to find a suitable replacement before the season kicks off in Bahrain on March 13th.
As the 2007 Formula One world champion, Raikkonen would seem to present the perfect choice in terms of previous success although he recently announced his plans for 2011 in the World Rally Championship. Last year, the Finn made his WRC debut with the Junior Citroen WRC team and now as team owner/driver - the same as Petter Solberg, and like Solberg, he has in place a contract with the French-based manufacturer to campaign the 2011 season with Citroen.
There are however, potential stumbling blocks over a possible deal with Raikkonen. A much publicised spat with the Renault management last year following reports the Finn was negotiating a drive for 2011 and also the salary demands he is likely to command. It was rumoured in his final year with Ferrari in 2009, the ex-world champion was in receipt of little less than £25m and while his absence from the sport will have devalued his stock slightly, the fact that his contract with Citroen may have to be bought - from their fiercest rival, that tally could possibly surpass the monumental mount he received 3 years ago.
Nick Heidfeld however, presents a safer investment option for the Enstone outfit. While unlikely to win races on a regular basis, he is a proven 'points generating' driver and the belief is that with all top line drivers unavailable for hire, if Renault's aim is to collect as many points as possible in place of the injured Kubica, Heidfeld could be given the nod.
While Bruno Senna was confirmed as the teams third and reserve driver at the recent R31 launch, it is understood that Lotus Renault team principal Eric Boullier is now in the search for a more established 'name' to fill the seat vacated by Kubica and that negotiations with Raikkonen have begun to try and buy him out of his contract for a reasonable price.

Saturday, 11 December 2010

Kubica to contest Monte Carlo Rally

Renault driver Robert Kubica will contest the world-famous Monte Carlo Rally again next month.
The Pole, who is an avid rally fan and has entered several lower-level events between grands prix in recent years, had tried to compete in Monte Carlo last year, only for his car to fail before the start.

The Monte Carlo Rally is regarded as one of the world's toughest events, as competitors tackle unpredictable changes from dry through wet to snowy and icy mountain roads, competing both in daylight and after dark.

It is currently not a round of the World Rally Championship, but has become the blue-riband event in the second-string Intercontinental Rally Challenge.

The car Kubica will use is not currently confirmed.

He is expected to drive a Renault again, having done all his recent rallying in Clios, in which case he would not be judged against the IRC front-runners as Renault only enters cars in the smaller classes further down the field.

But Renault's major new deal with Group Lotus does raise the possibility that Kubica could use a car from Lotus' owner Proton, which runs Satrias in the IRC's top S2000 class.

The 2011 Monte Carlo Rally runs from 19-22 January

Friday, 10 December 2010

F1 chiefs drop the ban on team orders in new rules

The controversial ban on team orders has been deleted from the Formula 1 rulebook in the latest set of changes.

The rule, which forbids teams telling a driver to cede to his team-mate, came under scrutiny after Ferrari were fined for using team orders in 2010.

The adoption of moveable rear wings to aid overtaking were also confirmed in the new FIA rules for 2011 while the Kers power-boost system also returns.

The governing body also confirmed a new 'green' engine for the 2013 season.

Many team bosses predicted the ban on team orders would be dropped from the new sporting regulations after Ferrari caused an outcry by appearing to give Felipe Massa a coded message to allow Fernando Alonso through to win the German Grand Prix.

They argued the rule, which was introduced in 2002 after Rubens Barrichello gifted a win to then Ferrari team-mate Michael Schumacher, was difficult to enforce.

Now the rule has been removed, the teams may tacitly agree not to use team orders as much as possible while article 151.c, which refers to bringing the sport into disrepute, remains intact.

That article warns against "any fraudulent conduct or any act prejudicial to the interests of any competition, or to the interests of motorsport generally".

In its new regulations, the FIA aims to improve sustainability by using 'green' engines in two seasons' time.
These powerunits will be four-cylinder, 1.6 litre turbos with energy recovery systems and fuel restrictions, with the aim of increasing efficiency by 35%

The agreement to switch from the current 2.4-litre V8s after months of tough negotiations - exclusively revealed by BBC Sport last weekend - is an attempt to mirror the trend towards fuel-efficiency in road cars and to popularise it, increasing public demand for such engines.

The movable wings, which will be used from the start of next season, are an attempt to improve one of F1's perennial problems - the difficulties of overtaking.

The wings will be operated by the drivers, who will be able to use them when they are within a second of a car in front which they are trying to overtake.

The gaps between the cars will be monitored electronically by the FIA and the wings will be switched on when the driver behind is within the requisite distance.

Rule makers will monitor the way the wings work through the 2011 season and adjust them so they fit the purpose for which they were designed.

While F1 bosses want to make overtaking easier, they want it to remain a challenge.

The calculations as to when drivers should be able to employ the wings are made more complicated by the return of Kers in 2011.

Although Kers remained in the 2010 regulations the teams voluntarily agreed not to use it last season, in particular to help with cost-cutting and the arrival of the three new teams.

These systems - which store energy that would have been wasted during braking and reapply it during acceleration to give a power boost of about 80bhp for seven seconds - were first used in 2009.

The teams have decided to use them again in 2011 as a first step towards 2013, when F1 is trying to embrace sustainability.

Mercedes and Ferrari had been reluctant to agree to the 2013 engine rules as recently as a month ago, believing that it was an unnecessary expense at a time when F1 was trying to reduce costs.

And F1 commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone has been consistent in his view that they were a bad idea.

But, as BBC Sport revealed, the rules were agreed in a series of recent meetings between F1's current engine manufacturers - which also include Renault and private company Cosworth - and the final touches were put to the regulations by a steering group of F1 engineers a week ago.

The aim is for the new rules to improve the efficiency of F1 engines by as much as 35%.

Care has been taken to ensure the performance of cars will not be affected and total power outputs will remain at current levels - approximately 750bhp. The new engines will not do more than 12,000 revs per minute - current F1 engines spin at 18,000rpm.

By adopting the regulations, F1 hopes to widen its appeal to sponsors - commercial insiders say some companies are reluctant to get involved in F1 because of its image of being wasteful with resources.

In subsequent years, complex new turbocharging technology called compounding will be introduced to further enhance efficiency.

The regulations have been framed to encourage the pursuit of efficiency in engine design, dramatically increasing the amount of power that can be produced per litre of fuel burnt.

Those lessons in efficiency can then be transferred to road cars so that considerably less fuel is used for a given amount of performance.

Sunday, 5 December 2010

Lotus to start 2011 season without KERS

Lotus has not changed its mind about running a KERS system in 2011.
In May this year, team boss Tony Fernandes said the Norfolk-based team had "good reasons" to build the 2010 car's successor without the energy recovery technology.

Another new feature of the technical rules for 2011 is an adjustable rear wing to help boost overtaking.

"We will have the adjustable rear wing but not KERS for the start of the season - it's in development - really because of engineering resource," technical boss Mike Gascoyne told edp24.co.uk.

"Over one lap, it's still not a big plus for its effort, involvement and negatives. Strategically off the start and in races, then yes," he said.

"But at the start of the year, KERS is not going to be the thing that gives us the step up.

"It's all the other things, and we've taken the choice to concentrate on all those because if we don't get them right, KERS isn't going to make a difference."

Lotus' new engine supplier for 2011 is Renault, so Gascoyne confirmed that when the team is ready to run with KERS, it will be the French marque's unit.

"Renault are very keen on green technologies and KERS, so it's something we will be pushing," he said.

Source: Motorsport.com

Proton confirms talks for partial Renault F1 takeover

Proton intends to push ahead with a partial takeover of the Enstone based Formula One team Renault.

Previously, it was believed the Malaysian carmaker was only in talks over a potential title sponsorship, with Renault F1 to be renamed after the Proton-owned British sports car maker Group Lotus.

But Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin Syed Mohamed Tahir, who is Proton's group managing director, told the Malaysian newspaper The Star that Proton is in fact negotiating to buy 25 per cent of the Renault team before the start of the 2011 season.

"Yes, that's the intent," he confirmed. "A decision will be made soon.

"We're close, just wait for a few days," added Zainal. "(The) 25 per cent (shareholding) is something that we are discussing.

"It's still too premature to disclose the exact percentage but it has to be a position where we can control our brand," he said.

Source: Motorsport.com

Mosley: Race calendar becoming too long for F1

A 20-race calendar is too long for Formula One, according to former FIA president Max Mosley.
2010's tally of 19 races was the equal-biggest in the history of the sport, and next year the rally is growing to twenty rounds.

The USA and Russia are set to join possibly more additional grands prix in the near future, moving Sir Frank Williams to recently muse that he can envisage a 22-race schedule before long.

"For me personally, it's too much," Mosley told the German newspaper Welt.

"In my opinion that's too many Sunday afternoons to expect people to dedicate to Formula One. At some point, it starts to become tiresome.

"And then if you start skipping a race here and there it can quickly become a habit and it can snowball in terms of the TV ratings," he added.

Mosley, whose successor as FIA president is the former Ferrari boss Jean Todt, is also worried that F1 team budgets are still far too high.

"In January 2008 I warned that without cost reduction it won't be only the small teams having problems," said the 70-year-old Briton.

"It has arrived: Honda, BMW, Toyota and Renault have gone because the budgets are out of proportion.

"This continues to be true and it worries me," admitted Mosley.

"There is the risk of a crisis in the short term," he insisted. "Currently, a great season is being celebrated but the future looks bleak.

"For 2011 you need $100 million, with 30 or 40 from Bernie Ecclestone, perhaps 20 to 25 from sponsors or the drivers. I'd say six teams are wondering where the rest is coming from.

"It's quite possible we'll lose two or three teams," warned Mosley.

His final act as FIA president was to entice new privateers onto the grid with very small budgets, but Lotus, Virgin and HRT have been criticised for lacking competitiveness.

"I don't agree," said Mosley. "They need to be given time to improve.

"Virgin's development has been downright revolutionary. Their car was built entirely without a wind tunnel and that's a warning for the likes of McLaren because their wind tunnels are like running a small town.

"On the other hand Virgin developed a car only with computer simulation and it's only two or three seconds slower.

"No one can argue that the huge cost of the wind tunnels is justified."

Mosley said a quick fix to the looming crisis would be a budget cap for 2012 and 2013, requiring teams to tighten their belts immediately.

Source: Motorsport.com

Di Resta better than champion Vettel - Franchitti

Paul di Resta is even better than F1's new world champion Sebastian Vettel.
That is the claim of triple Indycar title winner Dario Franchitti, who is Scot di Resta's cousin. 


Di Resta, 24, is on the cusp of his Formula One debut, having secured the 2010 DTM title and forged a strong link with Force India by spending last season as reserve and Friday driver. 


"He definitely has the skills," 37-year-old Franchitti told Germany's Sport Bild. 


"He is one of the most talented drivers I've ever seen," he added. "He beat Vettel in the Formula 3 Euro series (in 2006). 


"Sebastian is a good driver, but Paul is better," said Franchitti. 


Di Resta told Motorsport-Magazin.com: "Sebastian and I have had some ding-dong encounters, and I hope and feel sure that we can continue this in the Formula One arena." 


Source: Motorsport.com

Glock rules out Virgin departure

Timo Glock says he is “100% certain” that he is staying at Virgin for a second season, adding that the team has only held off from officially confirming him as it wants to announce its two 2011 drivers together.

The German, who joined the start-up Formula 1 squad from manufacturer giant Toyota last winter, signed a multi-year contract at the team but, despite issuing a statement on his personal website during the summer break in which he stated that he remained fully committed to the Virgin project, speculation has continued that he could yet seek a move up the grid.

That was fuelled by his absence from the draft 2011 entry list issued by the FIA earlier this week, Virgin one of three teams listed as having no drivers confirmed.

But in an interview published on Virgin’s website on Friday, Glock confirmed he was staying put for next season and thinks the team – which trailed Lotus in the new teams’ battle for the majority of its debut campaign – is ready to make progress in the new year, when it will have extra financial backing from Russian sportscar maker Marussia.

“I’m excited. And yes I am definitely driving for Virgin Racing,” he said.


Timo Glock says he is “100% certain” that he is staying at Virgin for a second season, adding that the team has only held off from officially confirming him as it wants to announce its two 2011 drivers together.

The German, who joined the start-up Formula 1 squad from manufacturer giant Toyota last winter, signed a multi-year contract at the team but, despite issuing a statement on his personal website during the summer break in which he stated that he remained fully committed to the Virgin project, speculation has continued that he could yet seek a move up the grid.

That was fuelled by his absence from the draft 2011 entry list issued by the FIA earlier this week, Virgin one of three teams listed as having no drivers confirmed.

But in an interview published on Virgin’s website on Friday, Glock confirmed he was staying put for next season and thinks the team – which trailed Lotus in the new teams’ battle for the majority of its debut campaign – is ready to make progress in the new year, when it will have extra financial backing from Russian sportscar maker Marussia.

“I’m excited. And yes I am definitely driving for Virgin Racing,” he said.


<A TARGET="_blank" HREF="http://sam.itv.com/accipiter/adclick/CID=0000bddb0774857100000000/acc_random=8722186867/SITE=ITV/AREA=SPORT.FORMULA1.NEWS/POSITION=1/AAMSZ=300x250/RS=K0771910095.K0771910018.K0771910039.K0771910243./SEG=SPORT.FORMULA1/pageid=357334804/relocate=http://servedby.flashtalking.com/click/14094;79447;151957;210;0/?g=0736DAD7AA5710&random=407309&ft_sgid=438&url=http://rewardyourthirst.com/default.aspx"><IMG SRC="http://servedby.flashtalking.com/imp/14094;79447;204;gif;ITV;300x250SportandEnts/?407309" BORDER=0></A>

“There has been a lot of speculation about me wanting to leave the team, but it is not about leaving a team, it is about wanting to do better and keep moving forward.

“It is not just 99.9% certain that I will stay, as has been reported - it is 100% certain that I am staying!
“Since the beginning I have had a long-term contract with the team and I said then that I was doing this to help build a team for the future. It would not be possible to do that in one year from nothing.

“Plus I think with everything we have learned this year we can take a very good step up next season. This is a great team of people who have given blood, sweat and tears to our first season. Some people haven’t seen that with their own eyes, like I have, so it’s easy to criticise or be cynical.”

Glock was partnered by rookie Lucas di Grassi this year but there have been strong suggestions that Jerome D'Ambrosio will take the Brazilian’s seat for 2011, Virgin having evaluated the Belgian in several first practice sessions towards the end of the season.

He thinks the team is right to bide its team over the second driver so to ensure it picks the perfect candidate to compliment his greater experience.

“Well, I am already confirmed so there is nothing new to announce about me,” Glock explained.

“But I understand that the team wants to announce the line-up together when the second seat is confirmed.
“I think it is right to take our time and make sure we have the best combination of youth and experience, plus make sure we have the best information going back into the team at testing and races to ensure we can develop as quickly as we want to and keep moving forward.

“I don’t think we will have to wait too much longer for that news – hopefully before Christmas!”

Glock admits there were times during the team’s debut campaign when frustration got the better of him, but says setbacks were to be expected and that as a whole Virgin’s year can be seen as “pretty incredible”.
"2010 was a tough test for us all, but we survived and it was ultimately very rewarding for me,” said the three-time podium finisher.

“There were frustrations along the way and when things don’t go well, as a driver who is ambitious, I admit it was sometimes difficult, but I joined Virgin Racing knowing there would be difficult times ahead so it wasn’t really a surprise to me. We were building something from zero – no team, no factory, no previous year’s car to develop from and no data.

“Everything we have we have built ourselves in the space of less than a year.

“We should also remember that we were also taking a pretty revolutionary design approach to the VR-01 [the team used a purely CFD philosophy].

“If you look at our season from that perspective, we have achieved something pretty incredible.”

Source: ITV-F1

Lotus season review

Lotus was the big success story among the three new teams this year. It was the pacesetter in its group virtually all season, wrapped up the critical 10th place in the constructors' standings, and snapped at the midfielders' heels on several occasions.
Having secured Renault engines, Red Bull transmission systems and some handy new technical signings for 2011, it looks set for a very promising future - though what it will actually be called next year remains uncertain...
With its 2010 entry not granted until September 2009, Lotus had less time than anyone else to get ready for this season - and yet it ended up comfortably the most successful of the new teams, and the one most likely to get among the established midfielders in 2011.

It was far from a flawless season, with reliability issues hard to shake off, and a row developing over the Lotus name which could yet see Tony Fernandes' squad rebranded over the winter, but overall, this was a triumphant debut for whatever this alliance between Malaysian and Norfolk talent ends up being called long-term.

Being out-qualified by Virgin's Timo Glock in Bahrain proved to be against the trend, as in the race not only did Lotus assert itself at the front of the unofficial new teams' class, it also got both cars to the flag at the first attempt.

By the end of the season, Lotus had taken 14 'class poles' and 12 'class wins', and had the three new teams been in a championship of their own, Lotus' Heikki Kovalainen would've won it by a colossal 120 points, with team-mate Jarno Trulli in second.

Lotus also claimed the highest placing for a new team in the constructors' championship, claiming the vital 10th place in the standings.
This was always likely to be decided on a tie-break of best results as for any of Lotus, Virgin or Hispania to actually get into the top 10 in a race was a long-shot.
Kovalainen's 13th place in Australia gave Lotus an early headstart in this quest, and it then pretty much put its position beyond doubt by taking 12th and 13th at Suzuka.

While Lotus had its rival backmarkers under control, one thing it couldn't do was get on terms with the rest of the field.

The T127 was a deliberately conservative creation - with such a tight timescale, the team felt its only option was to design a basic car that would get it on the grid and see it through 2010.
A revamp for the Spanish Grand Prix shaved off some of the car's excess weight, but the fundamental redesign it really required to get near the points was never on the cards, with Lotus declaring early on that as it was confident it had enough in hand to see off Virgin and Hispania this year, it would focus all its efforts on its 2011 car from the summer.

Although Virgin, which said it was also working with one eye on 2011, did get a little closer later in the season, in general Lotus' prediction that it was fast enough to win the new teams' race without any further developments proved correct.

There were a few occasions when Lotus had a shot at some giant-killing.
Inclement weather helped it reach Q2 in both Malaysia and Belgium, while Kovalainen gave his absolute utmost to get through in the dry in Monaco and Canada as well, just falling short on both occasions.

Strategic choices saw Kovalainen run as high as sixth in China too, and in the Monaco GP he did well to keep Vitaly Petrov's Renault in sight.
But Kovalainen's efforts to take the fight to teams ahead did provoke some controversy, when his Lotus became a launchpad for Mark Webber's Red Bull in Valencia.

Webber couldn't see why Kovalainen was trying to race the much-faster car (which was down among the backmarkers after a very early pit stop) when it was inevitably soon going to cruise past him, while Lotus strongly defended its driver's right to battle for position with whoever he pleased.

Overall, Kovalainen emerged from 2010 with his reputation fully restored after a disappointing McLaren stint, having been the class act among the new teams.

His team-mate Trulli actually ended up with the superior qualifying record, having rediscovered some initially missing speed following a change of chassis and adjustments to the steering system.

But Trulli's luck was abysmal, and he didn't have a single weekend without mechanical problems intervening at some point, with the fragile hydraulics proving particularly troublesome on his car.

Always a perfectionist who is only at his best when the chassis handles to his liking, Trulli admitted very early in the season that the T127 was not ideal for his style and that this was going to be a poor season for him.
Yet while he was very open about the problems with Lotus' 2010 package, Trulli was also quick to point out that in the fraught circumstances of the late entry, Lotus had done the very best that was possible, and that while he was writing this year off, he was very optimistic about the team's future.

Plans for the future dominated much of Lotus' season.
Next year it will receive the Renault V8 and Red Bull transmission system - effectively giving it a large part of the package that took Sebastian Vettel to this year's world title.

And steps have been taken to get the rest of the car up to scratch too, with technical chief Mike Gascoyne going on a recruitment drive that will see several key colleagues from earlier in his successful career rejoining him, led by Force India's Mark Smith, who also working alongside Gascoyne during Jordan's rise and the early days of the current Renault works team.

With the drivers both back on board for 2011 and a very promising technical and personnel package in place, the only lingering headache for Lotus is what it will actually be called.

The now Proton-owned Group Lotus is frantically expanding its motorsport activities, and wants to be representing the brand in F1 as well, mostly likely in partnership with Renault.

The current Lotus team is adamant that it has the rights to the Team Lotus title, insisting that the F1 racing and sportscar sides of the company were always separate operations and that Proton did not buy the former when it acquired Group Lotus.

Initially it seemed that Fernandes would seek a compromise and agree to rename his team, but then the 2011 entry list appeared with the Team Lotus name still listed for his cars.

The Malaysian declared that fan support - and Lotus seems to be earning a level of crowd affection reminiscent of Jordan's 'favourite underdog' status from its glory days - had convinced him to fight on, and if there's one thing this team has proved in its first year, it's that it shouldn't be underestimated by its rivals, whatever the battle...

Highlights: Managing to frighten the established midfielders in Monaco and Canada, getting both cars to the finish at the first attempt in Bahrain.

Lowlights: Every time Truli's car ground to a halt again, the name row, Kovalainen's tangle with Webber in Valencia.

Source: ITV-F1

2011 F1 drivers and teams Confirmed

The FIA released the teams and drives that have been confirmed for the 2011 season:


No. Driver Team Constructor
1
2
Sebastian VETTEL (DEU)
Mark WEBBER (AUS)
RED BULL RACING
(AUT)
Red Bull Racing
Renault
3
4
Lewis HAMILTON (GBR)
Jenson BUTTON (GBR)
VODAFONE MCLAREN MERCEDES (GBR) McLaren Mercedes
5
6
Fernando ALONSO (ESP)
Felipe MASSA (BRA)
SCUDERIA FERRARI
MARLBORO (ITA)
Ferrari
7
8
Michael SCHUMACHER (DEU)
Nico ROSBERG (DEU)
MERCEDES GP PETRONAS
F1 TEAM (DEU)
Mercedes
9
10
Robert KUBICA (POL)
TBA
RENAULT F1 TEAM
(FRA)
Renault
11
12
Rubens BARRICHELLO (BRA)
Pastor MALDONADO (VEN)
AT&T WILLIAMS
(GBR)
Williams Cosworth
14
15
TBA
TBA
FORCE INDIA F1 TEAM
(IND)
Force India
Mercedes
16
17
Kamui KOBAYASHI (JPN)
Sergio PEREZ MENDOZA (MEX)
SAUBER F1 TEAM
(CHE)
Sauber Ferrari
18
19
TBA
TBA
SCUDERIA TORO ROSSO
(ITA)
STR Ferrari
20
21
Jarno TRULLI (ITA)
Heikki KOVALAINEN (FIN)
TEAM LOTUS
(MAL)
Lotus Renault
22
23
TBA
TBA
HRT F1 TEAM
(ESP)
HRT Cosworth
24
25
TBA
TBA
MARUSSIA VIRGIN RACING
(GBR)
Virgin Cosworth